Supreme Court hands presidency to Bush

So just how partisan was this ruling?

Justice	Pres.	Bush/Gore Recount Vote
William Rehnquist*	Nixon (R)	Bush
Sandra Day O'Connor	Reagan (R)	Bush
Antonin Scalia	Reagan (R)	Bush
Anthony Kennedy	Reagan (R)	Bush
Clarence Thomas	Bush (R)	Bush
Stephen Breyer	Clinton (D)	Mixed
David Souter	Bush (R)	Mixed
John Paul Stevens	Ford (R)	Gore
Ruth Bader Ginsburg	Clinton (D)	Gore

*Chief Justice (by Reagan)

Seven of the nine justices were appointed by Republicans. These seven vote voted 5-1-1, while the two justices appointed by Clinton voted 0-1-1. So it wasn't strictly on party lines, but definitely not neutral either.

And what about the two justices appointed by Bush pere? Shouldn't these have recused themselves from ruling on the fate of Bush fils? It seems that this recusing business is more of a theory than something judges actually do. While I'm at it, how come members of Congress who are lawyers (most of them) find it ethical to vote for more laws, which make more business for lawyers?